Applies To: ProfitSword Corporate Admins
📝 Overview
If you are onboarding a new property that features two distinct brands or entities (often called a "dual-branded complex"), a critical decision must be made during setup: Should the complex be configured as one combined ProfitSword property or two separate entities?
The way you structure this setup will directly impact how you can report, budget, and analyze data across our modules, including ProfitPlan, ProfitPace, and ProfitAbility.
Ultimately, the final decision rests on how you report this property in your own accounting and financial systems. Below, we detail the trade-offs for each approach.
Option 1: One Combined ProfitSword Property
This setup treats both physical locations as a single, unified entity within ProfitSword, using a single Property ID.
| Advantage | Disadvantage |
| ✅ Optimized for Planning (ProfitPlan): All reporting data for the complex (e.g., combined Rooms, F&B) is available under one Property ID, which is the optimal structure for budgeting and planning modules. | ❌ Granularity Loss: You cannot easily separate and report on Revenue, Labor, or Expenses for each individual brand/flag within ProfitSword. |
| ✅ Simplified Rollup: Consolidated reporting for the entire complex is available immediately without needing to create a separate reporting Region. | ❌ Complex STR & Pace: Integrating data from two distinct STR/Pace files into a single property can be complicated and may require custom mapping. |
| ✅ Easier Onboarding: Only one New Property Setup Form needs to be completed. | ❌ Data Blending: If the two brands use separate source systems (e.g., two different PMS systems), the data must be mapped and merged before ingestion. |
Option 2: Two Separate ProfitSword Properties
This setup creates two distinct entities in ProfitSword, giving each brand its own unique Property ID.
| Advantage | Disadvantage |
| ✅ Maximum Detail: Provides the highest level of detail and reporting granularity for each individual brand/flag. | ❌ Complex Consolidation: Viewing consolidated reporting (the entire complex) requires creating a Site List and/or Region in the ProfitSword hierarchy. |
| ✅ Accurate STR & Pace: Each property ID can be accurately associated with its respective STR/Pace data feed and site ID. | ❌ Module Limitation: Consolidated reporting via Regions in modules like ProfitPlan and ProfitPace can be limited, as Regions may not support all site-level functionalities (like direct Pace integration). |
| ✅ Clear Separation: Data from distinct source systems (PMS, POS, GL) remains clearly separated. | ❌ More Forms: Two separate New Property Setup Forms must be completed. |
đź’ˇ Your Decision Guide: How to Choose
The best setup depends on your company's internal reporting needs. Use these guidelines to make your final choice:
- Prioritize Budgeting and Planning (ProfitPlan): If your primary goal is to budget, plan, and forecast for the entire combined complex using a single Property ID, Option 1 (One Combined Property) is usually recommended for the smoothest integration with ProfitPlan.
- Prioritize Brand-Level Detail: If you require strict separation and unique financial reports for Brand A and Brand B for internal and external use, choose Option 2 (Two Separate Properties).
Once you’ve made your decision, please notify your ProfitSword onboarding team, and we will ensure the correct forms and data flows are initiated.
Comments
0 comments
Article is closed for comments.